Quick update.
My brokerage account is active again.
I deposited $100 for regular trading of options just to confirm some suspicions on a strategy going forward and $600 in my Roth IRA account.
On a good note, it's only been a week, but other than the money spent on commissions, the Roth account is doing excellent. Eight total positions open in carefully selected dividend stocks with a dividend reinvestment plan (DRIP) set up and the net gain (commissions included) is sitting at $31.41 as of this writing.
For the regular account, I've selected 7 high volume low priced stocks after considering the Barchart lists
here and
here for several days. For all seven of the chosen stocks, I'm keeping my trade decisions simple by identifying the
support and resistance (S&R) lines. By choosing the monthly S&R as major decision points and weekly S&R as minor ones before drilling down to the daily chart, it makes it easier to identify ideal points of entry and exit for a particular trade.
I wasn't sure how much my commission on options were, so I made two bogus trades. I call them bogus because they were out-of-the-money weekly options trades lacking logic for their entry. A recent acquaintance had very passionately argued the probability of multiplying $100 into something around $10,000 within a few months using the same logic I used quite some time back, so I wanted to show just how often and how much you would have to be right on your trades in order to nullify the effect of commissions.
The first trade was placed for a T Mar $42 put on March 9. At the time the stock was trading around $41.8 and the option price as $0.33. There was no logic to this trade, so a
trailing stop of $0.10 was set. This is because commissions are around $5.00 per trade (plus some change for fees as I found out). For a $100 account, this is already eating up 10% of the balance when considering both directions of the trade. I decided since 10% is already going to commissions, might as well just risk 10% of the account per position. The $0.10 trailing stop means a potential loss of $10, which is 10% of the account.
Because a trailing stop was set, there was no real need to monitor the position. Thankfully it executed as planned with a total loss of
$20.10 on the account by the next day.
My "challenger" does not believe in setting automatic loss points and thinks you should just have a mental one and execute when it is needed. I disagree, so the next two trades had no stop losses or trailing stops. We used the same stock and an order for an Apr $41 put again at $0.33 on March 10. The order did not execute until March 15, but I disagreed with the trade direction so I sold at a price of $0.31 this morning and bought a Mar 24 $43 call at $0.09 instead. That's a
$12.10 loss on that closed trade, but I will simulate and continue to watch the price action over the next month just to see how it would've turned out. Since the price of the new position is pretty much equal to the amount acceptable as a risk, there will be no automatic trailing stop set for it.
The other trade entered on the same day (March 9) was a VALE Apr $9 put at $0.39 limit. The order filled at $0.38 and one week later with no stop loss or trailing stop, is currently sitting at a price of $0.205. That's somewhere around a
$27 loss after the commissions for exiting the trade is taken into account. Though a mental stop loss was set, I did not have time this week to continuously watch the price and place the sell order when appropriate. At the risk of even greater loss, I'll leave it for next week before getting rid of it
With 3 straight losses totaling
$62.27 so far, hopefully my point has been proven. If you are trading with a small account, watch your commissions and trade with an automatic stop loss. I prefer trailing stops since it adjusts with any potential gains. I'll be putting another $100 into the account and placing careful, deliberate trades next week.
This update wasn't as quick as anticipated. Quicker ones will follow.